ro | en
Cantacuzino Estate Summer School 2026, 8th Edition

Cantacuzino Estate Summer School 2026, 8th Edition

Authors: arh. int. Mihaela Lazăr, arh. int. Dan Adrian Ionescu, arh. Matei Cristian, arh. Radu Bogdan Alexandru, arh. int. Roxana Mitarcă, peisagist Alexandru Mexi

Collaborators:
Mihaela Iuliana Ciornei (arheolog, istoric de artă), Alexandru Purcaru (arboricultor atestat ISA), Raluca Iosipescu (arheolog, dr. în istorie) și Sergiu Iosipescu (arheolog, dr.în istorie universală), Daniela Guju și Giovani Luca (peisagiști, drd. în geografie)
Studenți de la arhitectură și peisagistică: Dragomir Daria-Alexandra, Antonia Deaconescu, Costea Cosmina - Georgiana, Duma Denisa Cornelia, Pușcoiu Ana-Maria, Clinci Teodora, Rebeca Grad, Ecaterina Matache, Dumitrescu Roberta-Aurelia, Gheorghișor Ana-Maria, Munteanu Anastasia Maria, Diaconu Agatha Iona, Petraru Cristina Maria, Bîrlă Flavia, Georgiana Elena Carbunescu, Radu Iulia Georgiana, Izet Raya, Andrei Andrada Maria, Andreea Maria Nistor, Costescu Raluca Elena, Ilinca-Alexandra Neculai, Ibrahim Rugayah Elena, Vătășelu Maria Teodora, Voicu Razvan Marian, Moraru Antonia, Munteanu Maria, Radu Andrei Zaharia, Ene Bianca-Maria, Brat Luca Gabriel, Oane Stefania, Draghici Ana-Hristiana, Dragan Andra, Grecu Laura Ștefania, Zahiu Antonia Mihaela, Mihaly Izabela-Iulia, Petruț Alexandra Diana, Klara Gabel, Soare Ema, Iulia Dobrovie, Duță Matei
Photo: Fundația Domeniul Cantacuzino

Authors’ Comment

CANTACUZINO ESTATE SUMMER SCHOOL, FLOREȘTI – 8th EDITION, 2026
Heritage as a Laboratory for Research, Restoration and Experimentation

The eighth edition of the Cantacuzino Estate Summer School in Florești continued the programme of applied research and education initiated in 2019, using the historic ensemble and its park as an open laboratory for understanding heritage. In 2026, the activities focused particularly on the direct relationship between architectural research and the restoration site, offering students the opportunity to observe real processes of conservation, intervention and recovery of historic fabric.

The presence of an active restoration site made it possible to move beyond a purely theoretical exercise. Buildings, materials and forms of deterioration were analysed directly through observation, discussions with specialists and close examination of the successive stages of intervention. Students were able to understand how the reading of a historic building precedes any restoration decision: identifying original materials, recognising later transformations, assessing deterioration, and distinguishing between elements that need to be conserved, repaired or completed. The restoration site thus became a pedagogical tool in which design, research and execution could be examined simultaneously.

A central place in the programme was occupied by the stone masonry workshop, organised in direct relation to the material character of the ensemble and to the restoration works in progress. Stone was approached not only as a building material, but also as a document of the building: through its texture, traces of workmanship, deterioration and methods of assembly, it preserves information about construction techniques and successive building phases. The workshop introduced participants to the properties of the material, traditional methods of working stone and the principles of interventions compatible with historic fabric.

Direct work with stone and specialist tools made it possible to understand the relationship between craftsmanship and the precision required in restoration. The observation of surfaces, edges, joints and traces of workmanship was complemented by practical exercises in which students experimented with stages of shaping and finishing. Direct contact with the material offered a perspective that cannot be fully acquired through drawings or technical documentation alone: the resistance of stone, the rhythm of the work, the behaviour of the material and the significance of every intervention on a historic surface.

The programme was complemented by activities carried out in the historic park, where landscape research, observations on vegetation and mature trees, the analysis of relationships between buildings and outdoor spaces, and temporary interventions extended the understanding of heritage from the architectural object to the wider cultural ensemble. Experimental projects and pieces of furniture developed within the Summer School explored reversible and non-invasive interventions, adapted both to the historic character of the site and to its contemporary use.

By bringing research, construction-site experience and practical work into close relation, the 2026 edition approached heritage as a process, rather than merely as an object of study. Restoration became visible and intelligible, material became an instrument of knowledge, and direct experience of the restoration site enabled students to understand the responsibility involved in intervening on historic architecture. In this context, the Summer School functions as a space of knowledge transfer between specialist, craftsperson and student, where learning is built through observation, dialogue and direct engagement with material.