ro | en
Palimpsest - The third cloister

Palimpsest - The third cloister

Authors: Elena-Cosmina Obagiu

Tutors: conf. dr. arh. Oana Diaconescu, lect. dr. arh. Daniel Armenciu, lect. dr. arh. Mihaela Lazăr, lect.dr. arh. Astrid Rottman, dr.arh. Andrei Mărgulescu, asist. arh. Ruth Iacob, lect. dr. arh. Răzvan Lăcraru, lucr.dr.arh. Justin Baroncea
Universitatea de Arhitectură și Urbanism „Ion Mincu”
Facultatea de Arhitectură de Interior

Authors’ Comment

The project proposes a layered spatial intervention, anchored in the historical and archaeological context of the Sant’Eustorgio complex in Milan. The intervention embraces the site’s complexity as an active backdrop for a contemporary architecture that does not reconstruct, but reactivates, transforming absence into a framework for civic resonance.
The architecture is conceived as a palimpsest, where temporal stratification, materiality, and light reveal the invisible layers of time, both in the terrain and in the proposed design. The intervention operates through relationships of continuity, tension, and void, generating a system of spaces that mediate between the city, the cloister, and the memory of the site.
Below street level, two major functions unfold: a cultural center and a Memory Lab, both situated beneath the walking surface. These spaces are envisioned as zones for reflection and encounter, where access, zenithal light, and raw materials foster an atmosphere of introspection and dialogue with the past.
At ground level, the access volume acts as a threshold, a transitional element between the urban fabric, the cloister courtyard, and the new verticality of the extended museum. The extension of the Diocesan Museum aligns both volumetrically and conceptually with the existing structure, preserving a delicate balance between intervention and the historic site.
Continuing this system, a reinterpreted public garden, traced on the grounds of the former monastic orchard, functions as a scholar garden, reviving the idea of open-air learning and cultivation as a communal gesture.
The proposed circulation is not directive but narrative: the visitor is guided through a path of discovery where space becomes a medium for temporal interpretation. Absence takes on a formative value, an active void that shapes presence and connects the community.
The intervention avoids an imposing character, proposing instead an architecture of resonance, one in which boundaries become filters and spaces invite rather than impose. In this logic, the construction becomes a vessel for memory, community, and belonging.



2025
Research through Architecture
Architecture Diplomas
Powered by: