ro | en
Apartment in interwar villa
  • Nomination for the “Interior Space Architecture / Interior Residential Design” section

Apartment in interwar villa

Authors: cond. arh. Cristina Stroe, arh. Alina Dumitrescu, arh. Ioana Ciobanu
Firm: Laboratorul de Arhitectură

Collaborators:
Consultanță structură: LMB STRUCTURI SRL
Photo: Kateryna Zolotukhina
Photo: Kateryna Zolotukhina

Authors’ Comment

Introduction

The apartment is located within a neoclassical building from 1927, in a central district of Bucharest. The intervention preserves defining architectural elements—lofty ceilings, original wooden joinery, and a sculpted, monumental staircase—conserved and structurally consolidated. The project redefines the interior as a contemporary domestic space, while maintaining a clear continuity with the building’s architectural identity.



Concept

The design approach sought to enable a dialogue between historical memory and contemporary living, steering away from stylistic imitation or excessive contrast. The decorative ceilings, generous room proportions, and original staircase were treated as fixed spatial anchors around which the intervention was calibrated.

Furniture volumes, material textures and the chromatic register build up a layered yet coherent atmosphere—one that interprets and reframes the existing context rather than overwriting it.
The proposal positions itself in relation to the Anuala 2025 theme—“Bucharest as an aesthetic city”—by advocating for beauty not through overt form, but through the thoughtful activation of inherited spatial quality.



Finishes

The finishing strategy respects the original material logic of the apartment. Triple-layer engineered wood flooring defines the living and sleeping quarters, following the typological layout specific to interwar interiors. Ceramic tiling with graphic patterns, evocative of early 20th-century decor, was introduced in entrance halls, bathrooms and the kitchen—offering both practicality and historical continuity.

Original wooden joinery, cornices, and plaster detailing were all conserved, restored, and reinforced. The chromatic palette, rich in warm, saturated hues—terracotta, burnt orange, sage green— echoes the atmosphere of late 19th-century bourgeois interiors, contrasting with neutral backgrounds and matte surfaces.



Furniture

The fixed furniture is custom-designed and locally fabricated, primarily in lacquered and veneered MDF. Each piece is both utilitarian and spatially intentional, maintaining volumetric legibility throughout the interior.

The living room is centered on a large-scale sofa, flanked by slender-framed armchairs and a locally produced solid wood table. The kitchen and bathroom furniture maintains the same formal rigor: clean planes, discreet metal accents and a subdued materiality.



Terrace

The terrace was conceived as a continuation of the original architectural logic. The intervention preserved the stuccoed neoclassical pediment and original balustrades, reinforcing the historic character of the façade. Flooring is rendered in checkerboard ceramic tiles, a motif typical of the interwar period.

Furnishings are sparse and carefully placed, complemented by restrained planting. A potted olive tree anchors the corner of the terrace, enhancing the domestic atmosphere without disrupting the architectural presence of the façade. The terrace remains a seasonal threshold space—fluidly transitioning between retreat and daily use.



Occupancy / Client

The apartment belongs to a young couple, recently married, whose lifestyle is sociable and active. The design process was shaped by a close collaboration between client and architect, allowing for precise alignment between spatial needs, material sensibility, and historical continuity.

In a city where architectural heritage is often undervalued or compromised, the project proposes a counter-narrative—one built on measured intervention, quiet preservation, and the rehabilitation of character.



Conclusion

The project’s value does not lie in a singular or spectacular gesture, but in the careful calibration of domestic space—through the conservation, restoration, and reinterpretation of existing architectural elements: the monumental wooden staircase, original joinery, ornamental plasterwork, decorative fragments, and selected pieces of furniture. It stands as a case for aesthetic restraint, architectural continuity, and a nuanced contribution to the evolving narrative of urban dwelling in Bucharest.